except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 31, 2018, at around 19:15, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported that “omans assault each other” in the middle-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam Police Station C District of Sungnam Police Station, Sungnam-gu, and the police officers belonging to the Sungnam Police Station C District of the Sungnam Police Station (the age of 27) and the police officers E (the age of 28) who were called out after having received a 112 report; (b) without any justifiable reason, she spited flas on the part of the above patrolmen, and assaulted, such as flabing flaf, flaf, flaf, flaf, flaf, flaf, flaf, flaf, etc., of the above patrolmen E.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers for 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including reflective points, etc.);