However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, as a company member, was an operator of the Internet car page “C” for the purpose of sharing information related to stock investment, and the victim D was the victim D.

1. On May 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the non-commercial restaurant located in Samsung-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) at the time, the Defendant was unable to receive a share investment payment from the members of the said Kapet at the time and received a new investment from other members; and (c) returned a part of the investment payment by pretending to the previous investors in such money; and (d) even if receiving a share investment payment from the damaged party, the Defendant was required to use the Defendant’s existing debt repayment and return the investment payment to the existing investors; and (c) the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and the profits; and (d) the principal would also be paid to the victim by paying 50 percent of the amount of the share investment to KRW 30 million.

“The phrase “ was false.”

On May 2, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received money KRW 30 million from the bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant under the name of the victim, from the victim, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

2. On December 1, 2013, the Defendant issued a false statement of investment (i.e., the amount of KRW 30 million) to the victim, i.e., the amount of investment (i., the amount of KRW 30 million) that was received from the injured party, notwithstanding the fact that there was no profit from the amount of investment (i.e., the amount of KRW 100 million). However, the Defendant posted a false statement of investment (i.e., the amount of KRW 30 million) as if the amount of capital was received from the injured party as a security, and then posted the false statement of investment (i.e., the amount of KRW 30 million) to the “C” page. As such, the Defendant made an additional investment (i.e

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received money KRW 61 million from the above bank account in the name of the Defendant under the name of the above bank under the name of the Defendant for the same day as the capital investment money.

Summary of Evidence

1.