The name of the first instance judgment and the judgment of the court below are indicated.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all the facts charged were recognized on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by violating the logical and empirical rules, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. Since the judgment of the court of first instance and the judgment of the court below have obvious errors in the indication of the name of each case, it is decided to correct them in accordance with Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent