However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, on September 20, 2016, refused the Victim D, who was the wife at the Defendant’s home located in Daegu-gu C or 201 on September 20, 2016, even though the Defendant got home to the Defendant’s home, and refused the Victim.

with the permission of the court.

“The head of the victim was blicked twice in drinking on the ground that the victim’s head was defective, the victim’s left part was flicked once in the hand floor, and the victim’s right end was flicked once in the middle, and the victim’s right right end was damaged by two weeks in the middle, one time in which the victim’s right end is flick.

2. Special intimidation: (a) the Defendant uses a knife knife (20cm in length, 10cm in length) that is a dangerous object in the kitchen at the time and place specified in paragraph 1; (b) and (c) with the knife in the part of the victim.

In addition, the victim threatened the victim by referring to as "I am girth to the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime, and each of the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that he/she has agreed with the victim, the fact that he/she is a contingent crime, the fact that he/she has no previous conviction heavier than the fine, and the fact that he/she is