A. The sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Considering the fact that the nature of the instant crime is not good, and that the Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he had committed several times of violence, strict punishment against the Defendant is necessary.

However, considering the conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and is too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.