beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.11 2017나305704

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the modification, deletion, or addition of the part of the first instance judgment multiplied by one of the following applicable methods. As such, this is citing the reasoning of the first instance judgment in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Pursuant to the 3rd Part "14:31." amended to "14:31.";

(b) eliminate “the same prejudice” in paragraph 11 of the third page; and

C. Under Part 3, the Defendant appealed against the above judgment as the Daegu District Court 2017No299, “The present Daegu District Court 2017No299, but the said court rendered a ruling dismissing the Defendant’s appeal on June 14, 2017. The said ruling was amended to the effect that “The present Daegu District Court 2017No299 was pending in the appellate trial,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 22, 2017;

(d)in addition, under paragraph 3, to the “based on recognition” of paragraph 4, the term “material fact to this court”;

(e)for the purpose of paragraph 12, the term “member” shall be read as “member”;

(f)in the case of paragraph 5, the term “residential” shall be read as “residential”;

(g) modify each of the “instant judgment” in Part 6(5) to “the first instance judgment”;

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.