2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition that the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects the mistake, and cooperates with the investigation of the narcotics offender. However, on July 8, 201, the defendant has been sentenced several times to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and on November 9, 2011, at the Daegu District Court sentenced on July 1 and two months to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.). After the execution of the sentence was completed, it is not good that the defendant received phiphones during the repeated period and administered two times, and the quality of the crime is not good. The decision of the court below is a recommendation type [basic and concurrent crimes: the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. by philon medication, each basic crime (the aggravated factor - the aggravated factor: imprisonment with prison labor for one year to three years, and multiple crimes: one year to four years, and one year to six years, and one of the above circumstances].

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.