마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) on the summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.
2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the Defendant’s acknowledgement of the instant crime and the reflection of the instant crime.
However, considering various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive for and details of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., including the fact that the defendant was sentenced to the suspended sentence due to the crime of the same kind in 199, the amount of marijuana handled, the fact that the recommended sentencing guidelines is at least eight months, etc., it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.