The defendant is a contracting public official who is engaged in C in a residential area.

On July 6, 2012, around 01:32, the defendant found that there was victim F (31 years of age, south) at the house of female-friendly E (30 years of age, female) in the parking lot of the "D apartment in Gangnam-gun, Gangnam-gu, Jinnam-gun, Seoul."

Therefore, violence such as allowing the victim to leave the apartment parking lot, making the victim's face one time at that place, going up on the part of the victim, and making the victim's face five times at that place.

Accordingly, the defendant caused the victim's injury to the victim, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, such as an internal pain, the restriction of his/her movement, and the chain of fluence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning report on internal investigation (related to attachment of a medical certificate for injury);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the suspended sentence: fine of 2,00,000 won for a fine of 2,00,000 won for a year) of the suspended sentence, the injured party’s reason for sentencing is serious, and the circumstances in which no agreement has been reached exist, the defendant needs to be subject to punishment corresponding thereto.

However, considering the motive and circumstances of this case, the sentence of the defendant shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that the defendant's primary and depth reflects the defendant's depth, deposited KRW 2.5 million for the victim, the defendant's depth takes into account the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and if the defendant is sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million for the defendant, the defendant's occupation may affect the defendant's occupation.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.