A. Facts of recognition 1) The Defendant’s interior interior interior interior decoration work (hereinafter “instant interior decoration work”).

Among them, the Plaintiff A and the Defendant completed the construction work of the ceiling and the wall design; the Plaintiff B’s electrical (electric equipment and decentralization); and the Plaintiff C completed the joint voting time, language, and automatic text installation work on February 16, 2016; (2) the Plaintiff and the Defendant confirmed that “the construction cost of KRW 5,100,000 for the above construction work shall be paid by March 1, 2016 after the completion of construction work; and the construction cost of KRW 6,450,000 for the above construction work shall be paid by March 16, 2016; and the construction cost of KRW 3,450,00 for the Plaintiff B and the Defendant was confirmed to be paid by March 1, 2016 for each of the Plaintiff and the Defendant respectively after completion of construction work.” < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 26805, Feb. 16, 2016; Presidential Decree No. 27520, Mar. 1, 2016>

[Ground for recognition] Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (this is presumed to be the authenticity of the entire document because there is no dispute over the part of the defendant's seal impression. The defendant defense that F forged each of the above documents by using the corporate design and the certificate of personal seal impression, but it is not sufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, according to the purport of Gap's evidence No. 11, it can be acknowledged that G, a real manager of the defendant company, prepared each of the above documents and delivered them to H on February 16, 2016, which is the fact that the actual operator of the defendant company, was the former operator of the defendant company, and delivered them to F, the representative of the I, and therefore the authenticity of each of the above documents is recognized)'s each statement, Gap's evidence No. 5-1, 2-2's each image, the purport of the whole pleadings as a whole.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant, barring special circumstances, shall pay the plaintiff A the construction cost of KRW 5,100,000, the construction cost of KRW 6,450,000 to the plaintiff B, and the plaintiff C.