대여금
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 200,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 30, 2015 to August 23, 2016.
1. Comprehensively taking into account the written evidence No. 2 as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff’s operating capital of 100,000,000 won, and KRW 50,000,000 on May 11, 2011, and KRW 50,000 on May 17, 2011, and KRW 50,000,000 on May 18, 201, with the maturity of payment on May 10, 201, agreed that interest rate of 10% per annum and delay damages shall be 20% per annum (hereinafter “instant loan”). The Defendant may recognize the fact that on May 11, 2011, the Plaintiff prepared and delivered the loan certificate (Evidence No. 2) with the borrowed amount of KRW 200,00,00 to the Plaintiff.
2. The allegations by the parties and the determination thereof
A. On September 29, 2013, the Defendant asserted the parties: (a) reduced the interest and other expenses not paid with respect to loans of the sum of KRW 200 million as stated in the said paragraph (1) by agreement with the Plaintiff; and (b) the Defendant paid KRW 100 million to the Plaintiff in its own name via D, on January 30, 2015; and (c) February 6, 2015.
On September 29, 2013, the plaintiff did not agree to exempt the interest of the loan of this case as of September 29, 2013, and on the second argument, it is acknowledged that D, the head of the defendant's account, deposited money as alleged by the defendant in the defendant's name, but it is not received as a statement of repayment of the loan of this case, but only sold the shares of the plaintiff's wife E to the defendant's head and received it as the price. The plaintiff asserts that the above share transfer and takeover contract of this case loses its validity, and thus, the plaintiff again paid the above money for the repayment of the loan
B. The Defendant’s first assertion (reduction of interest and other expenses) as a result of the appraiser F’s appraisal that the signature of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant was written by the Defendant. The Defendant’s first assertion (reduction of interest and other expenses) is acknowledged, and the authenticity of the entire document is recognized by comprehensively considering the facts recognized and the overall purport of the pleading in the testimony of the witness G [Agreement] No. 1 of the English Htd (hereinafter referred to as “