However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

At around 02:50 on May 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the home of the Defendant, 202, Masan-si, Masan-si, 202, Masan-si, Masan-si, 202, the police officers affiliated with the D District Police Station of the Msan-dong Police Station, called by the Defendant after receiving a report of 112 to assault the Defendant’s wife C, asked C about the circumstances of damage; (b) attempted to restrain the Defendant who is breathing; (c) 3 times by hand; (d) took three times by hand the parts of E; (d) took four times the parts of E’s mouth and walked the upper part; and (e) took off the part of E, sat off and sat off the

As above, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives and bodies of the people, prevention of crimes, suppression and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made to the police with respect to F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the 112 Reporting Report (Attachment to the 112 Reporting List) and attached documents to the 112 Reporting List;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] There is no person [the person subject to a special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and four months] (the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] six months of imprisonment, the suspended sentence two years (the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects his mistake, the fact that the defendant has no same record as or higher than the suspended sentence, the defendant does not repeat the same kind of crime again.

dismissed part of the prosecution.

1. From May 8, 2016, the Defendant’s assault among the facts charged in the instant case, at the home of the Defendant’s Changwon Masan-si 2, 202, around 02:50 on May 8, 2016, the Defendant heard the victim’s face at around 10 times with the Defendant’s house, that “I would soon see that I wish to drink while I wish to drink, I would like to drink.” while I would like to read that “I would return to this Chewing, I would return to that. I would like to do so.” The victim’s face is 10 times or more, and the victim would be sweed on the floor of the victim.