국가유공자요건비해당및보훈보상대상자요건비해당결정통지처분취
All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff (B) entered the Army on September 10, 2018, and was discharged from military service on July 8, 2019.
B. On July 9, 2019, the Plaintiff sawd to the Defendant on January 9, 2019 that “I am at the head of the police station. I am at around February 2019, and am at the stage of solidarity and at the National Armed Forces Yang-si Hospital, I am at around February 2019, after treatment.
3. 6. The head removed the suspicion.
For the same year
3. 22. The tissue inspection results were suspected of being B-cell forest franchising, leading to the consignment treatment to a private university hospital (C hospital).
After the inspection, the examination began after the annual salary type diagnosis and was hospitalized into the National Armed Forces Capital Hospital after treatment.
Current treatment is currently being treated.
For the reason that “the instant wounds” was applied for registration as a person of distinguished service to the State, on the ground that the application was different from the application for the “forest-feng Feng Feng Feng Feng Feng” (hereinafter “instant wounds”).
(c)
On April 13, 2020, the Defendant presented to the Plaintiff on April 13, 2020 that “it is difficult to recognize the personality of a public official solely with the fact that he was diagnosed and treated during the military service, and that the causes or risks of the outbreak of the traditional malicious forest species are infection, occupation, or environmental exposure, and infections include virus infections, such as EBV, HIV, HTV-1, HV-8, HCV-8, HCV-40, and specific germs infections, but there are many in the event of non-merchantss. However, the Plaintiff was exposed to the environment or cancer substances directly dealing with the inflammable substances during the military duties, and the disease in this case sharply aggravatedly aggravated due to the occurrence or the lapse of nature.
Since objective data to be seen has not been verified, it is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff’s injury of this case directly caused military duties or education and training, which are directly related to national defense, security, etc., or caused the outbreak or aggravation of the relationship with other military duties or education and training.