However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) taken an oath of the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 304, Seoul Eastern District Court No. 101, which was the Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul District Court, as a witness of the fraud case against the above court No. 2017 High Order No. 1082 C; and (b) sells the Lox G27 Game Controler at the Rox G27 Game Controler.

“The person making a letter is C, and the person making a report and contact D and E will send the object first to the person making a transfer of money.

Despite the fact that “A person who made a false representation is also C,” the public prosecutor’s “the witness” has committed fraud by bringing in collusion with C a letter stating that he/she sold the Lox G27 Game consortium in the openter and selling it.

“C did not involve any involvement,” and did not know of C in the drinking of “water.”

The testimony to the effect that it is “,” and the counsel’s writing is written to the effect that it sells the Lox G27 Game Controlls to the opening, and who dialogues between the victims and the Kakaox.

The term “assumed” was “assumed.”

The testimony was made to the effect that “.........”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of the examination protocol of the witness to the accused of the case subject to perjury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E and D;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 153 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate confessions;

1. In full view of the following circumstances and other records of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following conditions of sentencing.

The crime of this case is a crime that may endanger the judicial function of the discovery of substantial truth in a criminal trial, and is not good, and is confessions and reflects before the case subject to perjury becomes final and conclusive, and does not affect the result of the trial of the case subject to perjury.