2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The plaintiff served in the Army on September 7, 1979, and was diagnosed by the 106 Camp Hospital on May 26, 1980 as "the loss of the vertebrate 4 on both sides" at the 106Y Hospital. On July 22, 1980, the plaintiff was diagnosed as "the loss of the vertebrate vertebrate 4 on both sides" at the 106Y Hospital on May 26, 1980, and was charged with the disease on August 23, 1980.

B. On July 6, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on the grounds that “the loss of both sides in spine 4 and 5 in summary” was incurred during military service. However, on December 12, 2011, the Defendant determined that the Plaintiff’s military service and “the loss of both sidese spine vertebrate 4 and 5” did not constitute the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on the grounds that there was no proximate causal relation

C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation (Seoul Administrative Court No. 2013Gudan645) seeking revocation of the above decision of non-specific person of distinguished service to the State. On May 9, 2014, the above court clearly decided that the Plaintiff’s parts diagnosed with spine separation certificate at a military hospital was limited to “No. 4 and No. 5” rather than “Weatt No. 4,” on the ground that the Plaintiff performed 4-5 post-the-comfortization on the ground that the 4-5 post-the-5 post-the-comfortization was performed, it appears to have written the diagnosis name “Weat 4 and No. 5 Ebrate separation certificate” on the premise that the above decision was not caused by the spine separation certificate No. 5 on the premise that the Plaintiff was conducted, and that there was no other symptoms in the first five post-the-sfortization surgery on the part of both sides of the 4th century, and that there was no obstacle to the Plaintiff’s active service.