However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Whether the Defendant, from around 08:30 on September 12, 2017 to around 09:15 on the same day, was the enemy who was aware of before being damaged from “D main points” in the operation of the Victim C located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government;

I would like to hear the horses, and I would like to contact the victim “I you want to see today?”

gasa Doz.

If “I wish to enter one defect and to contact,” he expressed a bath, scam 3 packs several times, and continuously interfered with the victim’s main business affairs by force by leaving customers who had entered the place by avoiding the disturbance, such as “I would show the end of the truth at a proper level, I would not have to show the drinking value, and I would not enter the place.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the third public trial date);

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV verification);

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: The records of punishment for the same kind of crime are two times, except for the same crime, and the extent of interference with the execution of execution, and circumstances that are very favorable to the criminal records of the fine: The degree of interference with the duties is not serious, and the defendant's age, sex, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions for sentencing specified in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, sex, motive, means and consequence