2. In full view of the arguments in the instant case and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the record, the lower court’s sentencing on the Defendant appears to have been appropriately determined by fully taking into account all the circumstances, including the various reasons for sentencing alleged by the Defendant, and the mere fact that the Defendant led to the entire confession of the facts charged in the instant case at the trial is difficult to view the lower court’s punishment as

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, however, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that "D (State)" is "D (State) 10, 11 of the judgment of the court below on the second side of the judgment of the court below, "D (State)" is "D (State) ," and 9 conduct on the third side below "1. The defendant's appeal is corrected as "Article 355 (2) of the Criminal Act on the criminal facts" and "Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act" is amended as "Article 355 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act."