2...

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract for B vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff vehicles”) with the company running non-life insurance business, etc. as the insured, and the Defendant is the company running the taxi transport business, etc., and is the owner of the vehicle C in Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) and is participating in the Defendant vehicle mutual aid for the Defendant vehicle.

나. 원고 차량 운전자는 2016. 7. 18. 21:39경 서울 서초구 서초동 무지개아파트 앞 편도 3차로 도로를 남부터미널 방면에서 뱅뱅사거리 방면으로 1차로를 따라 진행하다가 2차로로 차선을 변경하던 중 원고 차량 오른쪽 부분으로 3차로에서 2차로로 차선을 변경하던 피고 차량의 왼쪽 측면을 충격하는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)를 일으켰다.

C. On July 29, 2016, the Plaintiff paid a total of KRW 1,161,560 for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident to Egympis Co., Ltd.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, Gap evidence No. 4, Eul evidence No. 2-1 and Eul evidence No. 2

2. Determination:

A. The background leading up to the occurrence of the instant accident, that is, the instant accident, which is, the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped on the left-hand turn line, in the first lane, where the front-hand signal is changed to the right-hand signal, and the driver’s negligence on the Plaintiff’s vehicle is the main cause of the instant accident, and the Defendant’s driver also has to examine whether the vehicle is changed to the two-lane, which is the front right-hand straight line, among the vehicles located on the rear or another lane when the vehicle is changed to the left-hand signal.