However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

At around 11:08 on November 9, 2013, the Defendant, driving the said string taxi at a 95-lane of the principle of the precautionary system at the Southern-si, Namyang-si, and continued to run the said string of the string distance from the shooting distance of the string of the string to the bank.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to not violate the report by properly manipulating the brakes and steering gear while looking at the front side and the left side of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving a string and driving a string and driving a string, shocked the part on the left side of the said string-house owned by the victim D, which was parked in the upper right side of the said string-house, and shocked the victim D(76) and the victim F(68) of the said string-down report into the front part of the said string-down, and 3 vehicles parked in the previous string-down commercial building.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence such as an injury to the victim D, such as an injury to the victim, such as a fry fry fry, which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of F and D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Photographs of the traffic accident place;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the Medical Certificate (F, D);

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no previous department, the fact that the automobile mutual aid association was admitted, the fact that the defendant is old, the circumstances of the accident, the degree of negligence, etc.);