Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

[2012 High Court 475] The defense counsel asserted that the facts charged under the first court 2012 High Court 475 were not specified, but the prosecutor's submission of an application for the modification of an indictment on May 28, 2013 and the court's approval of the modification of an indictment on May 29, 2013 was subsequently completed.

Defendant

A around March 31, 2012, around March 31, 2012, a person operating a “E restaurant,” “F restaurant,” or “G restaurant,” located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and around March 31, 2012, a Defendant’s employee, around the said E restaurant, provided personnel service to those who come to and go to the road outside the store, and entices those who come to and go to the outside of the store, and, at the same time, led the Defendant to commit a violation of the Defendant’s duties by attracting many unspecified customers.

[2012 high-level 499] Defendant A, at around 12:10 on March 10, 2012, around 12:3.2, 2012, around E-way located at the Mauri-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Taenam-gun, for the reason that the victim J ( South and 59 years old), the president of the I Tourism Association, carried out a campaign to eradicate the act of visitors, and put up a banner “the liquor tax for using the frequency recommended by the Tourism Association” on the ground that he puts up a banner “the liquor tax for using the frequency recommended by the Tourism Association.” Defendant A has a negative effect of a banner of KRW 40,00 at the market price managed by the victim I Tourism Association.

Summary of Evidence

[2012 fixed 475]

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Photographss of illegal business conduct and attached video CDs (video materials related to the guest activity) [2012 Go fixed 499];

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Statement of the police statement to K;

1. Application of statutes, such as site photographs;

1. Article 10, Article 97 subparag. 6, and Article 44(1) of the former Food Sanitation Act (Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013; hereinafter the same shall apply), Article 57 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act (Amended by Ordinance of the Prime Minister No. 1010, Mar. 23, 2013; hereinafter the same shall apply), which provides for the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and Article 17 of the same Act on the selection of punishment.