The Defendant of “200 Man-Ma478” from February 22, 2020 to around 06:07 between 06:07, at the entrance of the age-based room room in Mapopoposi B located in Gunposi B, by opening the automatic door by force two descendants, opened a ventilation door in a manner that cares for the upper part of the candle of the above automatic door installed and corrected, and opened the candle, and the victim D (56 years of age) opened the candle by using the smoke of the above escape room at the time of diving, the market price of the victim, which is in custody in the restaurant and cooling room of the above Doposi, is the sum of KRW 100,000,000,000,000 in the market price of the victim, which is owned by the victim.

2 cans, 2 cans, 2 cans, boomed, roasting, roasting, 2 roassing, 1 froased, 1 froasing, 1 froasing, froasing, 1 froasing, etc.

"2020 Man-Ma841" was committed by the Defendant at night by using a cresh in which the management of the sexual parties was neglected, in order to steal cash in a fluent parking lot installed in the sexual party. On May 1, 2020, at around 04:30 on May 1, 2020, the Defendant intruded into the above sexual parking lot with a entrance that was not corrected for the purpose of theft of cash by using the entrance that was installed in the fluent Si, Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si, Gunpo-si, and 5,000 won in cash was collected at the end

Summary of Evidence

"200 Highest 478"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. A investigative report (CCTV investigation) 2020 Highest 478;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Among concurrent offenders, there is no record of punishment for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that the defendant has been sentenced to more severe punishment than a fine, the value of the damaged goods is not deemed to be significant, the defendant continues to commit the crime at the same place and repeatedly, and his residence is a residence.