When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant operates D E, Inc., a cosmetic manufacturing and selling chain, which is operated by the defendant.

On September 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) within the area of DE located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju Northern-gu, the Defendant: (b) had attempted to undergo business start-up education to establish a new agent of the victim H (55 years old); and (c) had his/her cell phone twice around 21:50 and around 22:37, the Defendant: (a) had been detained by the victim on suspicion of injury in the case of accusation; and (b) had been rendered a final verdict of innocence by the Supreme Court, despite having been acquitted by the appellate court; (c) had been acquitted by the Defendant, the Defendant, instead of having written the name of “H (i) and the manager of H (5 years old), written the name and brought all things into D;

Under such agreement, the decision has been made under the agreement and the person has been detained and has been unfolded.

In lieu of sofing, the people have given up all I's things.

They need to be replaced by frauds by inner horses.

In this regard, the term “to be detained under the suspicion of fraud............................”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Recording recording (G or A telephone call);

1. A written confirmation of each fact by J and K;

1. Copy of the judgment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the additionally filed complaint and I opinion of the complainant;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant did not have any perception of intention or false facts about performance.

2. 1 Determinations. 1) Intentional intent on performance