2. Although the defendant is led to confession and reflects on the judgment, the account number of this case is not good by informing him of his name, despite being aware that the defendant was used for committing the crime of fraud, considering the fact that the court below seems to have determined punishment in light of the special larceny for which the judgment became final and conclusive and the concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, the defendant was unable to recover damage, and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, the motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing, are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.