If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 19, 2015, at around 22:05, the Defendant, upon receiving a report of 112 that there was a person who does not take care of at least a restaurant 109 of Pyeongtaek-si Building 109, solicited the Defendant to invalid home, and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the handling of the instant report by a police officer, such as having a flasium, flasium, and one time to flasium, and having a flasium of the Pyeongtaek-si Police Station D District called up upon having received a report of 112 and threatening him/her to return home.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the 11 case handling table;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Normal circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order: Determination as to reflectivity, the absence of the same kind of punishment power against a disadvantage: Defect of crime, and whether the sentencing criteria for the background of the crime are applied;