When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested a motor vehicle maintenance business entity “C” operated by the victim B to repair his/her own vehicle.

After that, on February 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) posted the bulletin board of “Nber” on the Internet portal site, as well as the following A(D); and (b) posted the title “C Maintenance Fraud” using A(D); (c) removed the term “C Maintenance Fraud” on the part of A(D); (d) artificially released the air conditioner level; and (e) removed the Defendant’s act of causing the Defendant to evade the Defendant’s legal act of promoting the use of the information and communications network (i.e., the act of promoting the use of the information and communications network by causing the Defendant to evade the Defendant’s actions of promoting the use of the information and communications network (such as promoting the use of the information and communications network) by causing the Defendant to prosecute the victim’s defamation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 313 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, including the background leading to the instant crime, the ex post facto agreement that the Defendant agreed with the victim, and all other conditions of sentencing that are shown in the oral proceedings, including the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal records, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime.