1. On April 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, on April 16, 2014; (b) around 14:20, the Defendant, without any reason, obstructed the legitimate performance of official duties by assaulting the police officers E belonging to the said district group, who were working in a situation-based situation, (c) and (d) having the left side of the said police officer one time, with drinking.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place of the statement in Paragraph 1., laid down the paper cupped Cup collection box and waste brush on the floor where the market price, which is a public object of water purifiers, could not be known on the ground as above, and damaged them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of ctv video photographing legislation

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 3,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the crime of this case interferes with police officers' performance of their duties, damage to police station's equipment, and the nature of the crime is good. However, there are extenuating circumstances for the defendant to take into account the motive and background leading up to the crime of this case, considering the circumstances in which the defendant committed the crime of this case at the time, the criminal records of the same kind in the past can be considered in light of the circumstances in which the defendant committed the crime of this case at the time. After that, in punishing the crime of this case, the criminal records of this case cannot be considered as a sentencing factors disadvantageous to the defendant, the defendant's act cannot be considered as a sentencing factors for the punishment of the crime of this case, the defendant's act is against himself, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, the circumstances after the crime of this case, etc. are considered comprehensively).