A. On February 5, 2015, the Defendant issued a promissory note with the face value of KRW 50 million at the face value, the place of payment on June 6, 2015, the Daegu Metropolitan City at the place of issue, and the payee’s “C” (hereinafter “instant Promissory Notes”).

B. The Plaintiff is a final holder of the Promissory Notes.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1, purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

(a) The holder of the check-keeping to determine the cause of the claim shall be bound by the series of endorsementss in order to be recognized as a lawful holder of the right on the bill, and the series of endorsementss refers to the series of series of endorsementss in order for the payee to be an endorser of the first endorsement and the person against whom the first endorsement is an endorser of the second endorsement to the present holder, such as the series of endorserss.

However, according to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, it is recognized that the addressee of the bill of this case is "C", and that the first endorsement was formally cut off from the above "C" because the first endorsement is written as the plaintiff.

그러나 배서의 연속이 흠결된 경우에도 그 흠결된 부분에 관하여 실질적 권리승계의 존재를 증명하여 가교(架橋)하면 어음소지인은 어음상 권리를 행사할 수 있는바, 증인 D의 증언에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, ‘C’라는 상호로 우유제품을 납품하는 D이 피고로부터 우유제품 대금 내지 선수금 명목으로 이 사건 어음을 교부받은 사실, 한편 D이 빙그레 등으로부터 납품받은 우유의 대금을 지급하기 위해 원고에게 이 사건 어음을 교부하고 선이자를 공제한 할인금을 받아 위 납품대금을 지급한 사실을 인정할 수 있으므로, 피고로부터 D 사이, D으로부터 원고 사이에 어음상 권리가 실질적으로 승계되었음이 인정된다.

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the defendant, who is the drawer of the bill of this case, is the plaintiff with KRW 50 million and the promotion of each lawsuit against the plaintiff.