On March 26, 2018, at the time of the victim's house located in 09:00, the Defendant: (a) the victim C (56 years old) who was a disabled person of Grade 6 years old prior to the Defendant's sentence was frightened and frightd at the house; and (b) the victim was found to have been in order to have the victim forced the victim to be hospitalized into mental hospital, and (c) the victim was found to have fright the vehicle of the Defendant discovered, and the victim was going to have fright away from her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her face

As a result, the defendant left the left-hand side of the treatment days by the disabled victim.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel have no record of her pro-friendly victim, as described in the facts charged.

3. Determination

A. Direct evidence, consistent with the facts charged in the facts charged in the instant case, is a victim’s photograph, victim’s statement (the second police statement), decision-making of the Committee on Correction of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities based on the suspect’s statement as indirect evidence, a nursing recording book for the nurse preparation, and a doctor’s opinion.

In addition, all the remaining evidence of the submission by the prosecution are consistent with the prosecution of the defendant or are insufficient to support the facts charged.

We examine the probative value of direct or indirect evidence.

B. In fact, the credibility of the victim’s statement is the most important evidence of this case’s statement.

However, for the following reasons, the victim’s statement that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case is difficult to be easily believed.

1 The victim has proved alcoholic content since January 2015.