폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On July 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 21:10 on the 15th day of the 2015, and around 101, the Defendant found D’s residence in the above apartment, which had been in a past in a breath state of alcohol, and went to the following: (b) on the 101st day of the 1st day of the 1st day of the 1st day of the 2015.
The Defendant: (a) the victim E (year 62) who was the above apartment security guard at the site after receiving the report was frightened by frightening himself, and frightened his arms and head, etc.; and (b) the victim was frightened by continuously frightening due to the security room, who was frightened by the victim, was frightened once a week; and (c) the victim was
2. The crime of assaulting the facts charged in the instant case is a crime that cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent (Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act). Since the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant on November 19, 2015, after the prosecution of the instant case, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.