2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant are as follows: (a) the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes and reflects the depth thereof; (b) the blood alcohol concentration was not relatively high by 0.075%; and (c) the Defendant appears to have committed each of the instant crimes on the day before the commission of the crime to a certain extent; and (d) there are some circumstances that may be taken into account in the course of the instant crimes, such as the Defendant’s awareness that drinking was broken to a certain extent.

However, in full view of all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstance of crime, circumstance after crime, etc., which are the conditions for the sentencing of this case, the lower court’s punishment is deemed reasonable and is too unreasonable, on the ground that the Defendant is deemed to be too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s above assertion by the Defendant is without merit, on the ground that the lower court’s punishment is deemed inappropriate, and it is too unreasonable, since the Defendant’s punishment is too too too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.