beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.02.01 2016가단520879

물품대금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,240,50 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from August 29, 2016 to February 1, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who produces gold, etc. with the trade name called C, and the Defendant is a company with the purpose of manufacturing and selling brushes, brushes, spawneds, spawneds, dental supplies,

B. On March 9, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a contract with a total contract amount of 12 million won (1,536,515 won for the production of a brush type, 422,000 won for the salt hold-type, and 583,453 won for the salt hold-type repair of 12,541,968 won for the total of 12,541,968 won for the payment period, value-added tax shall be payable at the time of issuance of invoice), and the payment period shall be July 18, 2014; six million won for the down payment; and six million won for the remainder of six million won for the salt hold-type and salt hold-type repair process (hereinafter “instant contract”). The Defendant paid the down payment to the Plaintiff on June 26, 2014 (hereinafter “instant contract”).

C. On March 9, 2015, with respect to the instant contract No. 1, the Plaintiff prepared and sent to the Defendant a letter with the following contents (hereinafter “instant letter”).

Each plaintiff shall, in concluding a gold contract with the defendant on March 9, 2015, fulfill the following terms:

A. L. L. L.I.

1. The terms and conditions of the terms and conditions of the contract prepared on June 18, 2014, which were not consistent with the delivery date due to the Plaintiff’s circumstances, are to pay the balance in full when the Defendant exported to Japan, and if the Defendant does not bring the goods to Japan, the Defendant would make the first sampling 20,000 for the purpose of using the goods for the other purpose and pay the balance when re-purchase is made after 3 months after the production of the first sampling 20,000 for the purpose of use for the other purpose.

2. In addition, due to paragraph 1, the Plaintiff’s brush that the Defendant proposed on the part of the damaged origin is to receive KRW 2.5 million, and the gold paper is to be manufactured and supplied.

(Design attached to brush photographs requested by the defendant shall be changed to that of the defendant)

3. March 9, 2015