2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions including the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and the amount of damage is considerable but not yet recovered, there are reasons such as the fact that the instant crime was already established, and the instant crime was concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act with the crime of fraud, etc., and that the Defendant was able to be tried at the same time, and that his mistake has been divided later.

Therefore, it cannot be said that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.