2. The Defendants interfered with the towing leading by the Victim G, which is a pastor, and Defendant A interfered with the towing of the victim by way of getting the victim to attend the lecture three times, etc. Defendant A and C, Defendant B and C did not punish the Defendants in the stairs that prevent the victim from getting the victim to go to the lecture, and the victim was not punished. The members of the church are also the Defendants, and Defendant A did not have any history of criminal punishment, and Defendant B and C did not have any history of criminal punishment, and other favorable sentencing factors such as the age, character and conduct of the Defendants, motive, means and result of the crime, etc., and other various circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the records and arguments of this case, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendants' appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.