2. Determination on the scope of damages

A. Regarding the claim for lost profits and funeral expenses, the Plaintiffs claim for damages of KRW 15 million, which is part of the lost profits due to G’s suicide, and funeral expenses KRW 5 million to the Defendant.

The plaintiffs' above claims are premised on the premise that the suicide of G was caused by the defendant's assault of this case.

However, evidence Nos. 7-4, 8, 10, 14, Eul evidence Nos. 10, 10, 14, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 6, 35, and Eul evidence Nos. 22-3, each of the following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the overall purport of the pleadings, i.e., the assault of this case was one-time, and the assault of this case occurred nine months prior to the occurrence of suicide by GIST, in light of the method and degree of the assault of this case, it seems difficult to anticipate the suicide by the assault of this case in light of the method and degree, and ii) G was under mental treatment due to the unknown detailed depression, and (iii) G was working without the assistance of the competent company due to the economic difficulties of the immediately preceding company of death, and there were economic and mental difficulties, such as the removal of additional revenue due to the completion of the contribution of "S" which was the only entertainment activity at the time, ④ there was a conflict with the company's termination of the agreement, and the prospects of the entertainment activity of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claim on the premise that G's suicide was caused by the defendant's assault in this case is made.