2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine; 50.

On March 31, 2013, at around 20:20, the Defendant driven a DNS car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.066% on the front of the gr3rdular street in the Gosi-Eup, Gosi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written reports on running a driver;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant under the influence of alcohol driving, one million won of fine on or around September 2003, one million won of fine on or around June 2006, and two million won of fine on or around July 2010 is not well-founded despite the fact that each of the summary orders was issued on or around July 2010, and the punishment for the crime of this case is not less severe, but the defendant is not subject to punishment. On the other hand, in consideration of the fact that there are no other criminal records against the defendant, and that there is no other criminal records against the defendant, the punishment is determined as ordered.