When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a non-registered Madern with no number plate at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph without mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statutes governing certificates for disuse of two-wheeled motor vehicles;

1. Relevant Article 46 (2) and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Indemnity for Motor Vehicle Damages, and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The part concerning dismissal of public prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention in a workhouse

1. On October 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a non-registered dial with no number plate around 02:00 on October 28, 2017; (b) and (c) led 2 to the front side road of the “C main store” located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, with the original effect of 2, as the front side road from a private street room.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has the duty of care to ensure that the driver is obliged to safely report the traffic situation of the front-

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was placed in front of the Defendant’s driving of the rear panioner of the e-rayed vehicle owned by the victim D, which was parked on the back-road with the care of the operation of the brake system.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the property owned by the victim by occupational negligence so that the amount equivalent to KRW 980,000 of the repair cost is equivalent to the above 980,000.

2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express will under the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.