beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.03.26 2014고단950

특수절도등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months for the first crime of aggravation in judgment A.

Defendant

Of the facts charged against A, theft.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On May 2, 2013, A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on May 2, 2013, and the above judgment was finalized on May 30, 2013, and Defendant B was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Suwon District Court on January 24, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the same day.

1. Defendant A

A. On October 12, 2013, at around 02:30 on October 12, 2013, the Defendant, along with S, destroyed and intruded the locking device by putting the entrance in hand, so far as it has been shakingd, and then contained 12 mobile phones, such as galle ju S4, which is the market value of the victim BJ owned in the said store, in advance.

(2) On October 17, 2013, at around 03:40 on October 17, 2013, the Defendant, along with S, destroyed and intruded the locking device by cutting the entrance in hand, so far as well as destroying and intrusioning the locking device, and then, was put into a bank with 25 cell phoness, including Aphones equivalent to KRW 18,797,000, the market price of the victim’s BM in the said store.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly stolen the victims' property two times in total.

B. On April 2012, the Defendant discovered a cell phone (a model name: LG-LU6200, serial number: 812211) owned by the victim from the victim’s cell phone (a model name: LG-LU6200, serial number: 81221) in Daegu Dong-gu BN, and stolen it.

2. On April 24, 2012, the Defendants’ co-principal Defendants and B Q posted the phone number of BT in the PC column located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, along with a letter stating that “The NAE sells the mobile phone options via which the opening is possible at KRW 1.50,00,000.” However, the Defendants sold the cell phone number that is false as they sold the normal cell phone number to the victim BS who reported and contacted.