2. Although the defendant had a criminal record for the same crime several times, he/she committed the crime of this case, the crime of this case and social harm are disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in full view of the following factors, the Defendant’s violation of the instant crime, the mere participation in the crime of general traffic obstruction, and the fact that it seems that the Defendant did not play a leading role only in the crime of general traffic obstruction, and the present position is coming back from the Democratic Labor Group E, a full-time employee, and all other conditions of sentencing specified in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s career, environment, character and conduct, and circumstances after the crime, even if considering the aforementioned circumstances, it cannot be said that the fine imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.