2. According to each of the legal statements of the defendant and witness E, notification of the control of drinking driving, and the report on drinking driver's situation, the fact that the defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol can be acknowledged as being stated in the facts charged.

However, in full view of the Defendant, witness F, E’s legal statements, and the Defendant’s pictures and records, etc., the Defendant: (a) 2 persons including G et al., and two persons including G et al., and E et al., a proxy driving engineer after drinking the vehicle; (b) f took the vehicle on the Defendant’s vehicle; (c) E became a pilot as a matter of course selection; (d) the Defendant stopped and unloaded the vehicle on the street; and (e) the Defendant requested the company that originally requested a proxy driving engineer to move the vehicle to move the vehicle; (c) the Defendant did not move the vehicle to E; (d) the Defendant stopped the vehicle at an opposite stop; (e) the point at which the vehicle was stopped after receiving a report from E; and (e) the first place at which the vehicle stopped was stopped cannot be seen as having been parked on the right side of the vehicle; and (e) it is difficult to view the safety direction at the time of stopping in light of the fact that the vehicle was stopped.