The original Defendant is the father of H (the father of September 17, 2008, hereinafter “the deceased”) and the mother I (the mother of February 19, 2016) co-inheritors.

On November 16, 1964, the Deceased purchased the real estate of paragraphs 5 and 6 in the attached list, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of Defendant F on the 21st of the same month.

On January 13, 2003, the Deceased completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the real estate in the attached list Nos. 1 to 4 of the same day donations to Defendant F.

On October 4, 2015, both the original Defendant and Defendant discussed to the Plaintiffs about the donation of real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”, and if each real estate is specified, it is classified by the same method as “instant 1 real estate”).

The plaintiffs suggested that around November 22, 2015, Defendant F should distribute all the heritages of the deceased including the instant real estate to Defendant F at the ratio of 36.375% and 12.725% of each of the plaintiffs.

(hereinafter “instant proposal for allocation”). Following that, Defendant F completed the registration of transfer of ownership on November 26, 2015 with respect to the instant real estate Nos. 1 and 2 by donations to Defendant G, who is an infant on November 26, 2015.

Defendant F, around July 11, 2016, deposited KRW 12,000,00 due to the guarantee relation of Plaintiff B to the Plaintiffs as of August 14, 2016, and provided measures to donate Plaintiff C’s real estate Nos. 4 and 6 of this case to Plaintiff A on condition that Plaintiff C’s transfer of real estate Nos. 1 and 2 of this case.

The deceased’s inherited property is only the real property of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Fact-finding, Gap 1 through 3, and 7 through 9 (including branch numbers), and the overall purport of the pleading, and the above fact-finding as to the ground for claim as to the part of the real estate Nos. 1 through 4 of this case, according to the above facts-finding, the defendants, co-inheritors, who are co-inheritors, are share 1/12 of the plaintiffs' legal reserve among the real estate Nos. 1 through 4 of this case.