beta
(영문) 대법원 2014. 09. 24. 선고 2014다214243 판결

피고 주장의 증거로는 체납자의 피고에 대한 채권이 변제되었다고 보기 어려움[국승]

Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court Decision 2013Na2020401 decided May 16, 2014

Defendant

It is difficult to see that claims against a delinquent are repaid as evidence of his claim.

Defendant

It is difficult to see that claims against a delinquent are repaid as evidence of his claim.

Cases

2014Da214243 Action

Plaintiff

Korea

Defendant

OO

Imposition of Judgment

2014.24

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

According to the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court determined that it was difficult to view that the Defendant repaid the lease deposit of this case to the Ora or OraB solely on the basis of the circumstances and evidence of the Defendant’s internal tax credit.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above fact-finding and determination by the court below are acceptable, and they do not exhaust all necessary deliberations or are free in violation of logical and empirical rules.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the due diligence or of misapprehending the legal doctrine on the interpretation of disposal documents.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

심급 사건
-서울고등법원 2013나2020401