On May 17, 2011, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s residence of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment 106, 1804, the Defendant was subject to a divorce lawsuit; (b) prepared a draft of the complaint; (c) prepared a draft of the complaint; and (d) submitted a draft of the complaint to the Defendant’s address in the New-dong, Seoan-dong, Seoan; (c) on the same day, there was a concern over whether the Defendant’s address might have stolen and stolen his seal imprint; and (d) submitted a draft of the complaint to the Defendant’s court to the effect that “The Defendant would have the Defendant’s address stolen and stolen his seal imprint; and (d) submitted a draft of the divorce lawsuit to the Defendant’s address to the effect that the Defendant would have forged any private document by using his seal imprint affixed; and (e) submitted each documentary evidence to the Defendant’s address to the Defendant; and (e) made it possible for the Defendant to write the front copy as well as the entire signature affixed to the Defendant’s signature.”

However, in fact, each of the above documents was prepared on behalf of the defendant by the defendant with the permission of the defendant to the effect that "I will not act to destroy the family peace for the purpose of maintaining the family peace" with the permission of the defendant on the condition that I would not act to destroy the family for the purpose of maintaining the family peace" due to the defendant's use of credit cards indiscreetly, and the defendant's act of forging the private document by making up and signing each of the books with the mind of the defendant D, was false.

Nevertheless, the defendant submitted the above written complaint to the public service offices of the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Office in the same Dong's Office, and submitted it to the public service offices of the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Office in charge of complaint, which is false for the purpose of criminal punishment