At around 07:30 on April 30, 2014, the Defendant, in front of the “C” guard room located in B at the time of stay, she saw the victim’s face from the victim D (the age of 57) who is his/her subordinate employee, and she saw the victim’s body to take care of about 28 days, and suffered injury, such as cutting off the body of the victim, which requires approximately 28 days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant's body (a statement that the defendant's body was fighting with D);

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Investigation report (a CCTV analysis in the course of committing a crime and attaching CCTV image CDs and caps) (the face of the defendant when he/she takes the face of D and the head of the vehicle when he/she takes the face);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the choice of punishment [the scope of recommending punishment] (the scope of general injury] does not exist in the basic area (4 to 1 year and 6 months) of the first type of bodily injury [the Decision of sentencing] [the extent of injury inflicted on the victim] [the Decision of sentencing] is serious, but the defendant has not recovered properly from the injury inflicted on the victim. In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. are considered to be the punishment as ordered in consideration of the sentencing conditions shown in the argument of the case, such as