2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and shows the appearance of his mistake, the fact that the defendant is not suitable for economic conditions as a basic living beneficiary, and the fact that the taxi cost acquired by the defendant as a 18,840 won is not relatively large.

However, the court below seems to have determined punishment by fully taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there is no change in circumstances that would be different from the court below's punishment in the first instance, the defendant's previous conviction was four times, the defendant did not agree with the victim or recover from damage until the court below was in the first instance, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime are considered appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.