Defendant

A is the professor of G University, Defendant B is the pastor of H church, Defendant C is the pastor of the I church, Defendant D is the pastor of the J church.

피고인들은 2016. 3. 4. 10:15 경 서울 강서구 K에 있는 G 대학교 ' 평생 교육원' 출입구 앞에서, 위 건물 2 층 법인 회의실에서 같은 날 10시부터 개최 예정된 피해자 ' 학교법인 L' 의 제 14-47 차 이사회에 M 이사가 참석하려 하자, 당일 상정된 이사 선임과 교수 임면에 관한 안건 이외에 피고인들이 반대하는 정관개정 문제도 이사회에서 관철시키려고 한다는 이유로 피고인 B는 ‘ 학교를 지킵시다.

Defendant A was not able to amend the table with his shoulder belts, with the 20-30 female name of H church that he works as his pastors, and with the screen 20-30 female name, and the screen 1’s amendment.’ Defendant A had a shoulder belt.

Recognizing that the commitment would be understood as "I wishing to enter the board of directors", the defendant C entered the board of directors, "I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am you am I am you am I am I am you am you am you am you am I am you am you am you am you am I am you am I am I am you am I am I am I am I am I am I am you am I am I am I am I am you am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am we am....

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the business of holding the board of directors of the victim institute by force in collusion with O and P.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants among the first trial records.