2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet (attached Form 1), [Attachment 2], and [Attachment 3] list (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”), and the Defendants are subject to the final payment order claim against Nonparty D, which is based on the final payment order claim against Nonparty D, and is subject to the seizure and collection order against each of the mortgage claims under the name of Nonparty D, which was created on each of the instant real estate owned by

B. On July 22, 2011, the Plaintiff completed the registration of creation of a collateral of KRW 1220,000,000,000,000 for each of the real estate listed in the list (attached Form 1) by the Seopopopool District Court of Jeju as of July 2, 201, the Plaintiff registered the creation of a collateral of KRW 1.222 billion for each of the real estate listed in the list (attached Form 2), as of November 21, 201, the obligor, the mortgagee D, and the maximum debt amount of KRW 1.222,00,000,000 for each of the real estate listed in the list (attached Form 3) by the debtor, the mortgagee, the mortgagee, the maximum debt amount of KRW 1.22,220,000 for each of the real estate listed in the list (attached Form 2) as of June 20, 2013, respectively.

(hereinafter referred to as the “registration of establishment of each of the instant units” in total.

After that, on April 28, 2014, the registration of the establishment of each of the instant neighboring mortgage units was completed with E on the grounds of the transfer of confirmed claim, and Defendant B and C completed the provisional disposition of the right to claim the cancellation of the registration of the establishment of a collateral security on May 23, 2014, by making the right to claim the cancellation of the registration of the establishment of a collateral security as the preserved right.

Defendant B, based on the executory order of the Seoul Southern District Court case No. 2007Guj3796 against Nonparty D on April 30, 2014, based on the executory order of payment of the case No. 2007Guj3796 against Nonparty D, Defendant C was issued a seizure and collection order of collateral security claims by designating the debtor as Nonparty D and the third debtor as the Plaintiff (Seoul Central District Court No. 2014TB12153 proviso, but the order contains a statement that “the creditor may collect the above seizure claims,” and Defendant C.