A. The description of the claim is as shown in the annexed sheet of claim.

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Part of the claim against the defendant B

A. (1) On March 28, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 32 million and the lease term from April 28, 2009 to April 14, 201 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with regard to the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si (hereinafter “instant real estate”) owned by Defendant B, and paid KRW 32 million to Defendant B.

(2) As to the instant real estate on the same day, the Plaintiff entered into a sublease contract with Defendant C with a deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 350,00,000, and the period from April 18, 2009 to April 17, 201 (hereinafter “instant sublease contract”).

(3) Defendant C paid KRW 10 million out of the above lease deposit that the Plaintiff paid to Defendant B, and used the instant real estate in delivery, and paid KRW 350,000 to the Plaintiff monthly rent by March 2015.

(4) The instant lease contract and sub-lease contract were explicitly renewed after the expiration of each of the above respective periods. Defendant C ordered the instant real estate to Defendant B and directors around July 2012. At that time, Defendant B paid KRW 32 million to Defendant C as the refund of the lease deposit.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 3-1 to 3-9, Eul 2-1 and 2-2, Eul 2-1 and 2-2, witness E's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of determination on the grounds of claim and determination, it shall be deemed that the instant lease agreement terminated at the time when Defendant C ordered Defendant C to order the instant real estate and director. Thus, barring any special circumstance, Defendant B jointly with Defendant C and sought by the Plaintiff.