Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

purport, purport, and.

A. The parties concerned are corporations established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling medicines, and the plaintiffs are workers employed by the defendant and provide labor for production of the amount at the defendant's party factory.

B. 1) On October 9, 201, 201, 83 employees, including the Plaintiffs, from among the employees belonging to the Defendant, are affiliated with the AK Branch of the National Chemical Textiles Industry Trade Union (hereinafter “instant trade union”).

(2) On October 10, 201, an inaugural general meeting was held, and the Defendant requested collective bargaining to the Defendant by notifying the Defendant of the demand for bargaining. (2) On November 22, 201, the Defendant: (a) on November 22, 201, issued an example of collective bargaining with the instant trade union at the Defendant’s reasonable factory workers’ welfare center; and (b) thereafter, between the Defendant and the instant trade union, the Defendant and the instant trade union were located in the meeting room of the Seoul Branch and the meeting room of the party factory workers’ welfare center of the Seoul Branch, and the collective bargaining was conducted more than six times in total.

3) The collective agreement proposed by the instant trade union in the course of collective bargaining includes not only matters concerning the determination of working conditions, but also matters concerning the personnel affairs of the union members, to consult with the trade committee, to form a personnel committee for the union at the time of division, merger, transfer, and relocation, to be notified and agreed upon by the union at the time of dismissal of employees for urgent managerial reasons, to recognize the instant trade union as the representative bargaining right holder, to bear the wages of the union operator, to provide the office, office, office, office, fixtures, etc. necessary for the union activities, and to not work as a substitute for non-members during the dispute period. 4) As the instant trade union did not reach an agreement on most of the collective agreement proposed by the instant trade union, the trade union of this case did not work as a substitute for non-members during the dispute period on January 17, 2012.