beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.01.17 2019고합327

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복폭행등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The seized Raz. 2 (No. 1) and the Home keyer (No. 2) respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Gohap327"

1. A special intimidation: (a) around 13:00 on August 24, 2019, the Defendant: (b) told the victim B (here, 78 years old) to yield a job in front of the Daegu Suwon-gu C apartment Dadong; and (c) threatened the victim B (here, 78 years old); (d) “Isn't have any person to sit in the male female at the same time. Isn't have any person to do so at the same time. Isn't have any person.” (a police officer) “Isn't have any person to do so.” (a police officer is also frighted.) of the size of drinking water, which is a dangerous thing on the floor of the roadside, led the victim to a threat that would inflict

2. 특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복폭행등) 피고인은 2019. 8. 24. 15:37경 대구 수성구 C아파트 D동 앞 노상에서 위와 같은 피고인의 범행으로 인해 피해자가 경찰 신고를 하여 입건되었다는 이유로 피해자를 찾아가 “왜 신고를 했느냐 너 같은 년 죽여도 눈 하나 깜짝 안한다”라고 말하며 손에 들고 있던 모자로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 2회 때리고, 발로 우측 정강이 부위를 1회 차고, 소지하고 있던 소주병을 들고 피해자를 때릴 듯한 태도를 보여 피해자를 폭행하였다.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim for the purpose of retaliation against the provision of a criminal complaint or accusation, statement, testimony, or submission of data in connection with the investigation or trial of his criminal case.

around 13:42 on August 20, 2019, the Defendant, “2019Gohap336”, intended to destroy the said management office by spreading home kis, and setting fire using home kiss at the entrance of the said management office where the employees of the said management office work for the reason that there was complaints from construction noise, at around 13:42, at the temporary management office of the Daegu Suwon-gu Suwon-gu Si apartment, and at the entrance of the said management office where the employees of the said management office work for the reason that there was complaints from construction noise. However, the employees of the management office failed to comply with

Accordingly, the defendant tried to destroy a building in which the employees of the management office were present, but that purpose is to do so.