beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.12 2014가합27895 (1)

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a person who runs the real estate brokerage business in the commercial zone in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and is the B and the post-ship relationship between C and the representative director of the corporation C (hereinafter “C”).

Around June 2010, the Defendant heard that the long-term lease business of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul District Housing Association (hereinafter “instant business”) promoted by C from B is insufficient to cover the business funds of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul District Housing Association, which was promoted by C, and then introduced the Plaintiff who became aware of while running real estate brokerage business around that time.

B. Around August 2010, the Defendant and the Plaintiff visited C office in order to newly build and sell a main complex building (360 households) with the size of 3,00,000,000 underground and 30,000,000 won on the land of F-M-M-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

C. ① At that time, the Defendant explained the above similar purport to the Plaintiff, and confirmed that the Plaintiff received official questions related to the authorization and permission related to the instant business from B, but did not directly verify the progress of the authorization and permission, and did not specifically investigate or confirm the progress of the project.

② On September 16, 2010, the Plaintiff paid KRW 50 million to B as investments, and KRW 50 million on September 24, 2010.

③ On September 28, 2010, when the Plaintiff received KRW 1.4 billion from B, the Defendant agreed to receive KRW 400 million from the Plaintiff.

B. ..